FeDlan News

  US Supreme Court to Decide Trump Criminal Immunity Claim in 2020 Election Case. In a pivotal development that could significantly impact the legal landscape surrounding presidential immunity, the United States Supreme Court has announced its decision to weigh in on former President Donald Trump's claim of immunity from criminal investigation and prosecution during his time in office. The case in question revolves around allegations of potential criminal conduct by Trump prior to the 2020 presidential election. The legal battle centers on whether a sitting president enjoys absolute immunity from criminal proceedings, a contention frequently invoked by Trump during his tenure. The Supreme Court's decision to take up the case underscores its importance in clarifying the scope of presidential immunity and its applicability to actions taken by a sitting president. The origins of the case trace back to investigations initiated by state prosecutors into various financial dealings an

U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Colorado Supreme Court Ruling in Landmark Decision In a groundbreaking decision, the United States Supreme Court has overturned a ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court, sending shockwaves through legal circles and sparking debates on the balance between state and federal authority. The case, [Case Name], had been closely watched due to its potential implications for the interpretation of constitutional rights and the relationship between state and federal jurisdictions. The outcome of the case has national consequences as Trump’s candidacy has been challenged under the Civil War-era provision, found in the 14th Amendment, in several states. Background: The controversy began when the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump should be excluded from the state's presidential primary because he was deemed by the court to have engaged in insurrection . The Colorado Supreme Court had previously ruled in favor of [party or legal principle], citing [legal r

Trump Seeks to Block Stormy Daniels, Michael Cohen Testimony at Hush Money Trial. In a dramatic turn of events, former President Donald Trump is making efforts to prevent the testimonies of Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen in an ongoing trial regarding hush money payments. The trial, which centers on allegations of payments made to silence women who claimed to have had affairs with Trump, has attracted significant attention since its inception. The case traces back to 2018 when Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney, pleaded guilty to charges related to campaign finance violations. Cohen admitted to orchestrating payments to two women, Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, in order to silence their allegations of affairs with Trump ahead of the 2016 presidential election. These payments, Cohen argued, were made at the direction of Trump himself, implicating the then-president in the scheme. Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, became a central figure in the

Deadline： White House 2⧸13⧸2024 ｜ 🅼🆂🅽🅱🅲 BREAKING NEWS Today February 13,...

The Rachel Maddow Show 2⧸13⧸2024 ｜ 🅼🆂🅽🅱🅲 BREAKING NEWS Today February 13, 2024

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the